DevFW-CICD/forgejo-helm
16
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
forgejo-helm/Chart.lock

19 lines
596 B
Text
Raw Permalink Normal View History

Properly lock chart dependencies (#326) Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/326 Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io> Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io> Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io> Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
2022-06-15 07:37:25 +00:00
dependencies:
feat!: set proper namespaces and allow override
2024-09-11 08:52:08 +00:00
- name: common
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
fix(deps): update subcharts
2024-10-21 00:01:05 +00:00
version: 2.26.0
Properly lock chart dependencies (#326) Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/326 Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io> Reviewed-by: luhahn <luhahn@noreply.gitea.io> Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io> Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
2022-06-15 07:37:25 +00:00
- name: postgresql
feat: use binamiy oci charts (#109) Co-authored-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@visualon.de> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/forgejo-helm/pulls/109
2023-03-21 10:19:39 +00:00
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
fix(deps): update subcharts
2024-10-07 00:01:35 +00:00
version: 15.5.38
[Breaking] Add HA-support; switch to `Deployment` (#437) # Changes A big shoutout to @luhahn for all his work in #205 which served as the base for this PR. ## Documentation - [x] After thinking for some time about it, I still prefer the distinct option (as started in #350), i.e. having a standalone "HA" doc under `docs/ha-setup.md` to not have a very long README (which is already quite long). Most of the information below should go into it with more details and explanations behind all of the individual components. ## Chart deps ~~- Adds `meilisearch` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready issue indexer. Only works with >= Gitea 1.20~~ ~~- Adds `redis` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store.~~ - Adds `redis-cluster` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store (alternative to `redis`). Only works with >= Gitea 1.19.2. - Removes `memcached` instead of `redis-cluster` - Add `postgresql-ha` as default DB dep in favor of `postgres` ## Adds smart HA chart logic The goal is to set smart config values that result in a HA-ready Gitea deployment if `replicaCount` > 1. - If `replicaCount` > 1, - `gitea.config.session.PROVIDER` is automatically set to `redis-cluster` - `gitea.config.indexer.REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED` is automatically set to `false` unless the value is `elasticsearch` or `meilisearch` - `redis-cluster` is used for `[queue]` and `[cache]` and `[session]`mode or not Configuration of external instances of `meilisearch` and `minio` are documented in a new markdown doc. ## Deployment vs Statefulset Given all the discussions about this lately (#428), I think we could use both. In the end, we do not have the requirement for a sequential pod scale up/scale down as it would happen in statefulsets. On the other side, we do not have actual stateless pods as we are attaching a RWX to the deployment. Yet I think because we do not have a leader-election requirement, spawning the pods as a deployment makes "Rolling Updates" easier and also signals users that there is no "leader election" logic and each pod can just be "destroyed" at anytime without causing interruption. Hence I think we should be able to switch from a statefulset to a deployment, even in the single-replica case. This change also brought up a templating/linting issue: the definition of `.Values.gitea.config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` in `ssh-svc.yaml` just "luckily" worked so far due to naming-related lint processing. Due to the change from "statefulset" to "deployment", the processing queue changed and caused a failure complaining about `config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` not being defined yet. The only way I could see to fix this was to "properly" define the value in `values.yaml` instead of conditionally definining it in `helpers.tpl`. Maybe there's a better way? ## Chart PVC Creation I've adapted the automated PVC creation from another chart to be able to provide the `storageClassName` as I couldn't get dynamic provisioning for EFS going with the current implementation. In addition the naming and approach within the Gitea chart for PV creation is a bit unusual and aligning it might be beneficial. A semi-unrelated change which will result in a breaking change for existing users but this PR includes a lot of breaking changes already, so including another one might not make it much worse... - New `persistence.mount`: whether to mount an existing PVC (via `persistence.existingClaim` - New `persistence.create`: whether to create a new PVC ## Testing As this PR does a lot of things, we need proper testing. The helm chart can be installed from the Git branch via `helm-git` as follows: ``` helm repo add gitea-charts git+https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart@/?ref=deployment helm install gitea --version 0.0.0 ``` It is **highly recommended** to test the chart in a dedicated namespace. I've tested this myself with both `redis` and `redis-cluster` and it seemed to work fine. I just did some basic operations though and we should do more niche testing before merging. Examplary `values.yml` for testing (only needs a valid RWX storage class): <details> <summary>values.yaml</summary> ```yml image: tag: "dev" PullPolicy: "Always" rootless: true replicaCount: 2 persistence: enabled: true accessModes: - ReadWriteMany storageClass: FIXME redis-cluster: enabled: false global: redis: password: gitea gitea: config: indexer: ISSUE_INDEXER_ENABLED: true REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED: false ``` </details> ## Preferred setup The preferred HA setup with respect to performance and stability might currently be as follows: - Repos: RWX (e.g. EFS or Azurefiles NFS) - Issue indexer: Meilisearch (HA) - Session and cache: Redis Cluster (HA) - Attachments/Avatars: Minio (HA) This will result in a ~ 10-pod HA setup overall. All pods have very low resource requests. fix #98 Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io> Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/437 Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
2023-07-17 19:09:42 +00:00
- name: postgresql-ha
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
fix(deps): update helm release postgresql-ha to v14.3.5
2024-11-04 00:04:25 +00:00
version: 14.3.5
[Breaking] Add HA-support; switch to `Deployment` (#437) # Changes A big shoutout to @luhahn for all his work in #205 which served as the base for this PR. ## Documentation - [x] After thinking for some time about it, I still prefer the distinct option (as started in #350), i.e. having a standalone "HA" doc under `docs/ha-setup.md` to not have a very long README (which is already quite long). Most of the information below should go into it with more details and explanations behind all of the individual components. ## Chart deps ~~- Adds `meilisearch` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready issue indexer. Only works with >= Gitea 1.20~~ ~~- Adds `redis` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store.~~ - Adds `redis-cluster` as a chart dependency for a HA-ready session and queue store (alternative to `redis`). Only works with >= Gitea 1.19.2. - Removes `memcached` instead of `redis-cluster` - Add `postgresql-ha` as default DB dep in favor of `postgres` ## Adds smart HA chart logic The goal is to set smart config values that result in a HA-ready Gitea deployment if `replicaCount` > 1. - If `replicaCount` > 1, - `gitea.config.session.PROVIDER` is automatically set to `redis-cluster` - `gitea.config.indexer.REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED` is automatically set to `false` unless the value is `elasticsearch` or `meilisearch` - `redis-cluster` is used for `[queue]` and `[cache]` and `[session]`mode or not Configuration of external instances of `meilisearch` and `minio` are documented in a new markdown doc. ## Deployment vs Statefulset Given all the discussions about this lately (#428), I think we could use both. In the end, we do not have the requirement for a sequential pod scale up/scale down as it would happen in statefulsets. On the other side, we do not have actual stateless pods as we are attaching a RWX to the deployment. Yet I think because we do not have a leader-election requirement, spawning the pods as a deployment makes "Rolling Updates" easier and also signals users that there is no "leader election" logic and each pod can just be "destroyed" at anytime without causing interruption. Hence I think we should be able to switch from a statefulset to a deployment, even in the single-replica case. This change also brought up a templating/linting issue: the definition of `.Values.gitea.config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` in `ssh-svc.yaml` just "luckily" worked so far due to naming-related lint processing. Due to the change from "statefulset" to "deployment", the processing queue changed and caused a failure complaining about `config.server.SSH_LISTEN_PORT` not being defined yet. The only way I could see to fix this was to "properly" define the value in `values.yaml` instead of conditionally definining it in `helpers.tpl`. Maybe there's a better way? ## Chart PVC Creation I've adapted the automated PVC creation from another chart to be able to provide the `storageClassName` as I couldn't get dynamic provisioning for EFS going with the current implementation. In addition the naming and approach within the Gitea chart for PV creation is a bit unusual and aligning it might be beneficial. A semi-unrelated change which will result in a breaking change for existing users but this PR includes a lot of breaking changes already, so including another one might not make it much worse... - New `persistence.mount`: whether to mount an existing PVC (via `persistence.existingClaim` - New `persistence.create`: whether to create a new PVC ## Testing As this PR does a lot of things, we need proper testing. The helm chart can be installed from the Git branch via `helm-git` as follows: ``` helm repo add gitea-charts git+https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart@/?ref=deployment helm install gitea --version 0.0.0 ``` It is **highly recommended** to test the chart in a dedicated namespace. I've tested this myself with both `redis` and `redis-cluster` and it seemed to work fine. I just did some basic operations though and we should do more niche testing before merging. Examplary `values.yml` for testing (only needs a valid RWX storage class): <details> <summary>values.yaml</summary> ```yml image: tag: "dev" PullPolicy: "Always" rootless: true replicaCount: 2 persistence: enabled: true accessModes: - ReadWriteMany storageClass: FIXME redis-cluster: enabled: false global: redis: password: gitea gitea: config: indexer: ISSUE_INDEXER_ENABLED: true REPO_INDEXER_ENABLED: false ``` </details> ## Preferred setup The preferred HA setup with respect to performance and stability might currently be as follows: - Repos: RWX (e.g. EFS or Azurefiles NFS) - Issue indexer: Meilisearch (HA) - Session and cache: Redis Cluster (HA) - Attachments/Avatars: Minio (HA) This will result in a ~ 10-pod HA setup overall. All pods have very low resource requests. fix #98 Co-authored-by: pat-s <pat-s@noreply.gitea.io> Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-chart/pulls/437 Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
2023-07-17 19:09:42 +00:00
- name: redis-cluster
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
fix(deps): update subcharts
2024-10-07 00:01:35 +00:00
version: 11.0.6
feat: merge upstream change week 2024-31 (#688) Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo-helm/forgejo-helm/pulls/688
2024-07-31 11:02:10 +00:00
- name: redis
repository: oci://registry-1.docker.io/bitnamicharts
fix(deps): update subcharts
2024-10-21 00:01:05 +00:00
version: 20.2.1
fix(deps): update helm release postgresql-ha to v14.3.5
2024-11-04 00:04:25 +00:00
digest: sha256:b3cf0e839e031fb61ff6e4e3f5ea9e1e48a08f1c9bb11f74119ef8caacebc063
generated: "2024-11-04T00:04:21.225200527Z"
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink