<!--- Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above --->
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
Introduces the CLI command flag `--disable-full-test`
By default, it doesn't alter the current behavior of the tests performed by the admission controller.
With or Without the flag, a full checkOverlap is actioned, without any alteration
and the object `pcfg` is created with the whole set of ingreses.
If the flag is set to true, it does manipulate the size of `pcfg` up to the content of $this single ingress.
This is achieved by overriding pcfg content by just the last slice that got recently appended to the object `ings`
```
if n.cfg.DisableFullValidationTest {
_, _, pcfg = n.getConfiguration(ings[len(ings)-1:])
}
```
The following steps of generateTemplate and testTemplate are significally reduced to a signle scenario
```
content, err := n.generateTemplate(cfg, *pcfg)
...
err = n.testTemplate(content)
```
This flag doesn't avoid the proper testing of collisions, neither bad syntaxis within the rendered
configuration of the ingress.
But it does eliminate a scenario, which I wasn't able to produce, where by for some reason even proper rendering
and valid values, without collisions of host/path may end into an invalid nginx.conf
The reasoning for this Feature is:
- Test duration increases by the number of ingresses in the cluster.
- File size grows to very important numbers 150-200Mb on clusters with just 2000~ ingresses.
- Tests in that scenario, takes approximately 20s using the last 0.48.1 improvements
- Produces a considerable memory consumption, as well as CPU, compute, that affects directly the containers
that serve traffic.
Since the flag is trully optional, and by default is disabled I fell as a good thing to have that can definitively
help on large-scale scenarios that still want to have a reasonable set of tests in place at a lower cost.
<!--- What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an `x` in all the boxes that apply: -->
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [X ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
Tested with the build kit the following scenarios on a cluster with 1000~ ingresses:
- With Flag Disabled or Flag, not present (current status as per 0.48.1)
collision scenario (wrong snippet content):
`kubectl apply -f ../collision-syntax.yaml 0.18s user 0.05s system 3% cpu 6.639 total`
collisions scenario (duplicated host):
`kubectl apply -f ../collision-host.yaml 0.17s user 0.05s system 3% cpu 6.245 total`
create/update:
`kubectl apply -f ing-215.yaml 0.16s user 0.05s system 3% cpu 5.845 total`
- With Flag Enabled (true):
collision scenario (wrong snippet content):
`kubectl apply -f ../collision.yaml 0.18s user 0.02s system 57% cpu 0.347 total`
collision scenario (duplicated host):
`kubectl apply -f ../collision.yaml 0.21s user 0.06s system 85% cpu 0.318 total`
create/update:
`kubectl apply -f ing-973.yaml 0.17s user 0.03s system 72% cpu 0.271 total`
As part of the test, I did verified that the created nginx for the test was of a smaller size, and that it didnt affect negatively the final nginx.conf (of a much larger side) where this was merged by the next steps in place after the validation. I couldn't observe any other change in the behaviour and so far the routine looks simple and non harmful.
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply. -->
<!--- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! -->
- [x] My change requires a change to the documentation.
- [x] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
- [x] I've read the [CONTRIBUTION](https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) guide
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
- [ ] All new and existing tests passed.
For the test part, I would need to understand the placement and test case that this would require, I wasn't able to see an existing scenario for this
* Add a flag to specify address to bind the healthz server
Signed-off-by: m.nabokikh <maksim.nabokikh@flant.com>
* Add healthz host to the helm chart
Signed-off-by: m.nabokikh <maksim.nabokikh@flant.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ricardo Katz <rikatz@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ricardo Katz <rikatz@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix ingress-nginx panic when the certificate format is wrong.
Signed-off-by: wang_wenhu <976400757@qq.com>
* Add unit test.
Signed-off-by: wang_wenhu <976400757@qq.com>
* Update controller_test.go
Add: new parameter in the ConfigMap to control whether the proxy-ssl parameters of an Ingress should be applied on server and location levels, or only on location level
Add: logic in the config handling to work according to the new ConfigMap parameter
Add: unit test case
By default you might want opentracing off, but on for a particular
ingress.
Similarly, you might want opentracing globally on, but disabled for
a specific endpoint. To achieve this, `opentracing_propagate_context`
cannot be set when combined with `opentracing off`
A new annotation, `enable-opentracing` allows more fine grained control
of opentracing for specific ingresses.
Add support for backends which require client certificate (eg. NiFi)
authentication. The `proxy-ssl-secret` k8s annotation references a
secret which is used to authenticate to the backend server. All other
directives fine tune the backend communication.
The following annotations are supported:
* proxy-ssl-secret
* proxy-ssl-ciphers
* proxy-ssl-protocol
* proxy-ssl-verify
* proxy-ssl-verify-depth
1. Session cookie is updated on previous attempt failure when `session-cookie-change-on-failure = true` (default value is `false`).
2. Added tests to check both cases.
3. Updated docs.
Co-Authored-By: Vladimir Grishin <yadolov@users.noreply.github.com>
In case some ingress have a syntax error in the snippet configuration,
the freshly generated configuration will not be reloaded to prevent tearing down existing rules.
Although, once inserted, this configuration is preventing from any other valid configuration to be inserted as it remains in the ingresses of the cluster.
To solve this problem, implement an optional validation webhook that simulates the addition of the ingress to be added together with the rest of ingresses.
In case the generated configuration is not validated by nginx, deny the insertion of the ingress.
In case certificates are mounted using kubernetes secrets, when those
changes, keys are automatically updated in the container volume, and the
controller reloads it using the filewatcher.
Related changes:
- Update vendors
- Extract useful functions to check configuration with an additional ingress
- Update documentation for validating webhook
- Add validating webhook examples
- Add a metric for each syntax check success and errors
- Add more certificate generation examples
