diff --git a/caching.md b/caching.md
index 9368dc0..29cfe4e 100644
--- a/caching.md
+++ b/caching.md
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@
 - Currently of out Scope
   - Auth: Cache provides data to anyone who can reach it
 
+- Nice to have
+  - Repo Cache: Can store uploaded artifacts
+
 ### Architectural Solutions
 
 #### File System-Based Caching
@@ -98,15 +101,17 @@
   - basically only maven support
   - does not suffice for our use case
 
-- Community Edition has more features but is limited in sizing. Upgrade to Pro edition necessary in those limits are exceeded.
+- Community Edition has more features but is limited in sizing. Upgrade to Pro edition necessary if those limits are exceeded.
 
 #### Artifactory
 
 - Open source / free version
+
   - Limited feature set
   - Separate distributions per repo type java / container / etc
 
 - Inconvenient and insufficient for our use case
+- Full feature set requires paid license
 
 License evaluation needed
 [EULA](https://jfrog.com/artifactory/eula/)
@@ -116,6 +121,8 @@ License evaluation needed
 [GH](https://github.com/artipie/artipie)
 [Wiki](https://github.com/artipie/artipie/wiki)
 
+- Self-hosted and upstream artifact caching
+
 - MIT License
 
 - might be abandoned / low dev activity / needs new maintainer
@@ -124,17 +131,32 @@ License evaluation needed
 - Mostly headless
   - Brings a limited web interface
     - Repo creation, artifact viewing
+- Buggy default config
+  - config changes require restart, which seems to be a bug?
+- Easy to setup, once bugs and buggy config are mitigated/worked around
+- File system and object storage supported
+- No databases required
 
 - Pro: Config in yaml file
 
+- Due to its simplicity it might be a good candidate for a first upstream caching solution
+
 #### Pulp
 
 [Website](https://pulpproject.org/)
 [GH](https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore)
 
+- Self-hosted and upstream artifact caching
+
 - GPL 2.0 License
 
 - Pull-Through Caches are only technical previews and might not work correctly
+  - Pull-through cache does not fit into the concept of how artifacts are stored an tracked
+  - Intended workflow is to sync dedicated artifacts with some upstream repo, not the entire repo
+- Setup and config are quite complex
+  - Build for high availability
+- File system and object storage supported
+- Requires SQL Db (Postgres) and possibly Redis
 
 #### kube-image-keeper
 
@@ -186,5 +208,17 @@ License evaluation needed
   - Reduces build times significantly if dependencies have to be downloaded from outside networks
   - Avoid using fs cache, i.e. forgejo runner cache, long term or at all
     - Unless you can handle proper cache invalidation
-    - Promote immutable infra and reproducible builds without side effects
+    - Promotes immutable infra and reproducible builds without side effects
   - Use as additional layer if there is no local cache repo
+
+- Repo caches
+  - Can replace file system cache if network and repo are fast enough
+  - Optimal solution would be a Nexus/Artifactory-like unified solution
+    - Foss solutions like Artipie and Pulp have severe problems
+      - Requires us to add features/fixes/maintenance
+  - Due to scarce landscape of proper foss solutions we might have to opt for multiple dedicated solutions
+    - If we opt for a dedicated container cache, we should re-evaluate Harbor or Quay
+
+- Try to use Artipie as a first, simple solution and use Forgejo Runner caches in conjunction for even better performance
+  - If Artipie does not work correctly or does not fit some reason we didn't waste too much time on it
+  - If Artipie is abandoned but the concept works for us, we should consider maintaining it and continuing its development